“Hands give the game away” is one of those phrases people say as if ageing were a police investigation and our knuckles had turned informant. I reject the premise. Hands do not give the game away. Bad lighting, dry cuticles and unflattering nude polish give the game away.

Hands are meant to look lived in. They have carried bags, held children, opened wine, signed things, cleaned things, pointed dramatically at menus and removed price tags from questionable purchases. A hand with no history is not aspirational. It is suspicious.

That said, I am not above improvement. I simply prefer improvement without hysteria.

Moisture is not optional

Hand cream is not glamorous until you stop using it and suddenly your hands look like they have been sending smoke signals. Mature skin on the hands can become thin, dry and papery faster than the face because we wash them constantly, expose them to weather, and then forget them until a photograph ruins the afternoon.

Keep hand cream where you will actually use it: by the sink, in the car, beside the bed, in the handbag you carry most, not the imaginary elegant handbag you think represents you spiritually.

The texture matters. Daytime hand cream should sink in quickly or it will end up on your phone, your steering wheel and your last remaining patience. Night cream can be richer. Cuticle oil before bed is boring advice, but annoyingly effective, like drinking water or not replying to certain messages.

Polish makes a difference

Nails do not need to be long or theatrical. In fact, very long nails can make mature hands look harder, depending on shape and colour. Short-to-medium, well-shaped nails with a flattering polish can make the whole hand look more intentional.

Soft rose, deep berry, warm red, sheer milky tones, browned pinks, chic taupes — all can work. The wrong beige can be dreadful. Some nude polishes make hands look elegant. Others make them look refrigerated. Choose carefully.

A proper red on older hands can be fabulous. Anyone who says otherwise may be safely ignored, along with people who use the phrase “age appropriate” near lipstick.

Lighting is the real villain

Overhead lighting is not honest. It is cruel. There is a difference. The same hand can look elegant by a window and like a cautionary tale under supermarket LEDs. This is why beauty photography lies by omission. It does not show you the lighting that did the heavy lifting.

At home, do not judge your hands under the worst light in the house. You would not hold a first date in a hospital corridor, so do not assess your cuticles there either.

Warm side light is kinder. Daylight is informative. Candlelight is practically philanthropic.

Do we need treatments?

Some women love professional treatments for hands: peels, lasers, filler, whatever is fashionable and medically sensible. Fine. I have no moral objection to tweakments when they are chosen calmly rather than from panic after seeing a tagged photograph.

But the basic maintenance still matters more than people think: sunscreen, cream, cuticle care, gloves for cleaning, polish that flatters, and not using your hands as though they belong to someone you dislike.

Hands do not need to look young. They need to look cared for. There is a world of difference.

Vivienne’s verdict: A good hand cream, flattering polish and better lighting will do more for morale than another lecture about ageing gracefully.